Rezeption des wissenschaftlichen und öffentlichen Diskurses zum Thema Nanosicherheit im Internet
Pardi, G., Gottschling, S., & Kammerer, Y. (2024). The influence of knowledge type and source reputation on preferences for website or video search results. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 75, 521-537. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.24771
Open Access
Pardi, G., Gottschling, S., Gerjets, P., & Kammerer, Y. (2023). The moderating effect of knowledge type on search result modality preferences in web search scenarios. Computers and Education Open, 4, Article 100126. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100126
Open Access
Gottschling, S., & Kammerer, Y. (2021). Readers’ regulation and resolution of a scientific conflict based on differences in source information: An eye-tracking study. Discourse Processes, 58(5-6), 468-490. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0163853x.2021.1930808
Open Access
Kammerer, Y., Gottschling, S., & Bråten, I. (2021). The role of internet-specific justification beliefs in source evaluation and corroboration during web search on an unsettled socio-scientific issue. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(2), 342-378. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0735633120952731
Volltext anfordern
Gottschling, S., Kammerer, Y., Thomm, E., & Gerjets, P. (2020). How laypersons consider differences in sources’ trustworthiness and expertise in their regulation and resolution of scientific conflicts. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 10(4), 335-354. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2020.1849856
Open Access
Gottschling, S., Kammerer, Y., & Gerjets, P. (2019). Readers’ processing and use of source information as a function of its usefulness to explain conflicting scientific claims. Discourse Processes, 56(5-6), 429-446. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0163853x.2019.1610305
Volltext anfordern
Gunser, V. E., Gottschling, S., Brucker, B., Richter, S., Çakir, D. C., & Gerjets, P. (2022). The pure poet: How good is the subjective credibility and stylistic quality of literary short texts written with an artificial intelligence tool as compared to texts written by human authors? Proceedings of the First Workshop on Intelligent and Interactive Writing Assistants (In2Writing 2022). (pp. 60-61). Dublin: Association for Computational Linguistics. https://aclanthology.org/2022.in2writing-1.8
Gunser, V. E., Gottschling, S., Brucker, B., Richter, S., Çakir, D. C., & Gerjets, P. (2022). The pure poet: How good is the subjective credibility and stylistic quality of literary short texts written with an artificial intelligence tool as compared to texts written by human authors? In J. Culbertson, A. Perfors, H. Rabagliati, & V. Ramenzoni (Eds.), Proceedings of the 44th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (44, pp. 1744-1750). Cognitive Science Society. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1wx3983m
Gunser, V. E., Gottschling, S., Brucker, B., Richter, S., & Gerjets, P. (2021). Can users distinguish narrative texts written by an artificial intelligence writing tool from purely human text? In C. Stephanidis, M. Antona, & S. Ntoa (Eds.), HCI International 2021 - Posters. HCII 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science: Vol. 1419 (pp. 520-527). Springer. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78635-9_67
Gottschling, S., Kammerer, Y., & Gerjets, P. (2023, June 28-30). Illusion of truth? Effects of repeated exposure to textual misinformation on readers’ knowledge and response confidence. Annual Meeting of the Society for Text and Discourse (ST&D). Oslo, Norway. [Talk]
Gunser, V. E., Gottschling, S., Said, N., Brucker, B., Richter, S., & Gerjets, P. (2023, April 19-21). NarrAItions: Co-creating short narrative texts with AI - metacognition and stylistic properties. Retreat of the LEAD (Learning, Educational Achievement, and Life Course Development) Graduate School & Research Network. Schwäbisch Gmünd. [Poster]
Gunser, V. E., Gottschling, S., Brucker, B., & Gerjets, P. (2022, March 20-23). Same same but different? Readers differentiation between human and AI poetry. 64. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psycholog:innen (TeaP) - Conference of Experimental Psychologists. University of Cologne (online conference). [Talk]
Gottschling, S., Kammerer, Y., & Gerjets, P. (2021, August 2-4). Investigating differences in experts’ and laypersons’ evaluation of a scientific conflict with eye-tracking and cued-retrospective thinking aloud. Annual Meeting of the Society for Text & Discourse (ST&D). [Talk]
Gunser, V. E., Gottschling, S., Brucker, B., Richter, S., & Gerjets, P. (2021, October 20-22). Can users distinguish narrative texts written by an artificial intelligence writing tool from purely human text? Retreat of the LEAD (Learning, Educational Achievement, and Life Course Development) Graduate School & Research Network. Schwäbisch Gmünd. [Poster]
Xemaire, J., Gottschling, S., & Kammerer, Y. (2021, August 2-4). Educating about the misinformation effect prior to reading does not seem to reduce it. Annual Meeting of the Society for Text & Discourse (ST&D). [Talk]
Gottschling, S., & Kammerer, Y. (2020, July). Eyes on the Source! – The Role of Differences in Source Trustworthiness on Lay Persons’ Attention to Source Information during the Resolution of Scientific Conflicts. Annual Meeting of the Society for Text & Discourse (ST&D) (online conference). [Talk]
Gottschling, S., Kammerer, Y., & Gerjets, P. (2020, October). Differences in experts and laypersons’ sourcing when reading about a scientific conflict in nanosafety an eye tracking study. Nanosafety 2020 (online conference). [Poster]
Gottschling, S., & Kammerer, Y. (2019, July). Reducing reliance on misinformation through psychoeducation in combination with an error-marking task. Annual Meeting of the Society for Text & Discourse (ST&D). New York, USA. [Talk]
Gottschling, S., & Kammerer, Y. (2019, August). Reducing reliance on misinformation through psychoeducation and an error marking task. 18th Biennial Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI). Aachen, Germany. [Talk]
Gottschling, S., & Kammerer, Y. (2019, September). Reduktion des Fehlinformationseffekts durch eine kombinierte Intervention aus Psychoedukation und dem Anstreichen von Fehlern. Tagung der Fachgruppen Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie (PAEPSY). Leipzig, Deutschland. [Vortrag]
Gottschling, S., Kammerer, Y., & Gerjets, P. (2018, November). Readers’ processing and use of source information as a function of its usefulness to explain conflicting scientific claims. Workshop on Multiple Documents Literacy. Bochum. [Talk]
Gottschling, S., Kammerer, Y., & Gerjets, P. (2018, July). Readers’ Attention to and Use of Source Information as a Function of its Usefulness to Explain Conflicting Scientific Claims. Annual Meeting of the Society for Text & Discourse (ST&D). Brighton, UK. [Talk]
Gottschling, S., Kammerer, Y., Thomm, E., & Gerjets, P. (2018, June). How Source Information Influences Lay People's Interpretation of a Scientific Conflict. International Summer School “Trust in mediated communication”. Münster. [Poster]
Gottschling, S., Kammerer, Y., Thomm, E., & Gerjets, P. (2018, August). ‘Down to the source!’ ‒ Lay peoples’ use of source information in the evaluation of conflicting scientific claims. European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI). Special Interest Group (SIG 2): Comprehension of Text and Graphics. Freiburg. [Poster]
Brömme, R., Gottschling, S., Brucker, B., & Gerjets, P. (2017, March). Upside down: hand proximity fosters attentional processing but not cognitive control in a visuospatial task-switching paradigm. 59. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen (TeaP). Dresden. [Talk]
Gerjets, P., & Gottschling, S. (2017, März). Kontroverse Wissenschaft: Wie beurteilen Laien Informationen im Internet? Workshop Nanosicherheit 2.0 (Leibniz-Forschungsverbund Nanosicherheit), INM – Leibniz Institut für Neue Materialen. Saarbrücken. [Vortrag]
Gottschling, S., Kammerer, Y., Thomm, E., & Gerjets, P. (2017, September). Der Einfluss von Quelleninformationen und persönlichen Einstellungen auf die Interpretation eines wissenschaftlichen Konflikts. Gemeinsame Tagung der Fachgruppen Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie (PAEPSY). Münster. [Poster]
