Perception and Action

The Perception and Action lab investigates processes of human perception and action in digital knowledge environments. These environments are often dynamic (e.g. educational videos), agentic/social (they allow interaction with human and digital agents) and noisy (e.g. they contain misinformation and opposing opinions). How do individuals navigate through such environments?

Focus of the lab

The Perception and Action lab examines various aspects of human perception and interaction with digital media and technologies. The following research foci illustrate the scope of the work:

  • The research focus Perception and Action in Comprehension is primarily concerned with how dynamic knowledge content (videos, comics) is perceived and mentally organised.
  • The research focus Perception and Action in Cooperation deals with the exchange of information between humans and agentic technologies (e.g. robots, generative artificial intelligence).
  • The research focus Perception and Action in Controversies investigates the interplay of attitudes, knowledge and metacognition when dealing with opposing opinions (e.g. in online forums) as well as with science communication using digital media on politicised scientific topics such as climate change.

In all projects, lab members explore how information is selected, organised and integrated with existing knowledge. The lab cooperates with specialists from cognitive, computer and educational science. The research approach is multi-methodological and combines laboratory experiments, online studies and analyses of social media data.


Employees

Projects

  • How do we read comics? – Investigating comprehension processes in visual narratives

    Perception and Action

    Duration 01/2020 - open

    Narratives communicate information in many ways, for example in books, audio dramas, films, or visual narrations like comics. While there is extensive research on text or film comprehension, relatively little is known about comic comprehension. Visual narratives, however, offer many possibilities in formal and informal education settings. This project therefore addresses the question how we comprehend and process visual narratives like comics.

    Go to project
  • Info-noise: Investigating the cognitive effects of noisy information environments

    Perception and Action

    Duration 03/2023 - open

    While historically, the aim of propaganda was to convince citizens of a certain agenda, novel forms of disinformation come with a different goal in mind: To confuse, rather than convince. Or, as former president Trump’s advisor Steve Bannon put it: “The Democrats don’t matter. The real opposition is the media. And the way to deal with them is to flood the zone with shit”. Although this zone-flooding strategy poses a serious threat to democratic functioning, it currently lacks empirical investigation that maps out its effects on citizens. We conduct a rigorous, pre-registered investigation into the effects of zone-flooding that harnesses state of the art-methods from Signal Detection Theory and metacognition to illuminate pressing questions: Does zone-flooding affect citizens’ ability to distinguish truth from falsehood? Does it affect their insight into the accuracy of this distinction? Does it render citizens more skeptical or more gullible? And are these effects politically symmetrical?

    Go to project
  • Factors of narrative understanding

    Perception and Action

    Duration 02/2022 - open

    The comprehension of different types of narratives, such as text, pictures, or comics, is important for societal participation. This dissertation project investigates how narrative comprehension changes with age and which factors contribute positively or negatively to narrative comprehension. These findings are essential for the development of interventions for different age groups and thus for greater societal participation.

    Go to project
  • Prosocial behavior towards artificial agents

    Perception and Action

    Duration 02/2021 - 01/2025

    As the world becomes increasingly technologically forward, the presence of artificial agents in day-to-day life also becomes more apparent. Studying the interaction between humans and artificial agents, such as robots, has long been in the research spotlight. While research in this field is traditionally focused on how robots can improve our lives, this PhD project aims at flipping the focus on humans helping robots.

    Go to project
  • Climate change denial in the digital age: An in-depth analysis of the effects of social media use

    Perception and Action

    Duration 07/2023 - 10/2023

    Belief in climate change misinformation such as denying its anthropogenicity has been shown to confuse the electorate, and stall political action. While the extent of the public’s incorrect beliefs is comparatively well-understood, its causes are subject to an ongoing debate. One of the most prominent questions centers around the role of social media: Does social media use drive widespread belief in science-related misinformation?

    Go to project
  • A metacognitive account of politicized science

    Perception and Action

    Duration 04/2022 - open

    How do citizens form beliefs about politicized topics science such as climate change, COVID-19 or vaccinations? In this project, we illuminate the role of metacognition, the insight that citizens have into the reliability and fallibility of their own knowledge and reasoning.

    Go to project
  • Perception of agents' skill

    Perception and Action

    Duration 07/2020 - 06/2024

    The human environment is populated by other agents. Other humans make up an important part of this, but animals and increasingly autonomously acting machines, i.e., artificial agents, also act without explicit prompting. As a result, their actions are sometimes incomprehensible. This hinders joint work, which is meant to be facilitated by automation. An important aspect of any interaction with other agents is understanding the other. This includes assessing the capabilities of the other person. In a cooperative situation, it is important to be able to assess how much you can rely on your partner. In a competitive situation, you need to assess in which aspects you are superior.

    Go to project
  • How do people deal with opposing opinions?

    Perception and Action

    Duration 01/2012 - open

    It is generally believed that humans prefer information that confirms their attitudes and avoid information that represents opposing views. Striving for confirmation and congeniality are also held responsible for a number of toxic phenomena on the Internet, such as the emergence of echo chambers and filter bubbles, the polarization of society, or the dissemination of misinformation. The present project investigates how people deal with opposing opinions – are they really ignored?

    Go to project
  • Mental representation of scenes: Discriminability of true and false information

    Perception and Action

    Duration 12/2021 - 11/2024

    In various research areas and topics such as climate change or testimonies it has already been demonstrated that mental representations are influenced by true and false information. Problematically, it becomes increasingly difficult to identify false information in our daily lives. Furthermore, new technologies simplify the creation of realistic-looking false messages in media. This dissertation project, therefore, addresses the question of how discriminability of information influences mental representations.

    Go to project
  • Natural and mediated perception of dynamic events

    Perception and Action

    Duration 09/2022 - open

    How do people perceive dynamic media such as educational videos, movies, or soccer broadcasts? Human information processing is specialized in processing dynamic information. It distinguishes relevant, and thus informative, information from irrelevant information. This project follows two research lines, bridging the gap between cognitive psychological theories of event cognition and typical situations of media reception. On the one hand, we investigate the perceptual and psychological foundations of dynamic event perception by specifying, for example, the processes of encoding and the properties of mental representations of natural action sequences. On the other hand, we use cinematic stylistic devices (e.g., different camera perspectives, film editing) and new cinematographic film techniques (e.g., 3D films) to explain basic psychological processes, such as the experience of spatial presence or the experience of suspense.

    Go to project
  • Understanding the underlying mechanisms of information processing and propagation – The role of metacognition

    Perception and Action

    Duration 10/2020 - open

    Do people know about their own knowledge? And how does this relate to their experience and behavior? In this project, we investigate how insight into ones’ own cognition relates to information selection and processing, as well as opinion and judgment formation.

    Go to project
  • Psychological explorations of Artificial Intelligence

    Perception and Action

    Duration 07/2023 - open

    Generative Artificial Intelligence is capable of generating texts or images based on verbal prompts. With its universal range of application fields and the human-like output quality the interaction with generative AI becomes increasingly similar to the interaction with other humans. How does interaction with generative AI impact human behavior, understanding, and trust, and how can these insights be used to optimize human-machine collaboration?

    Go to project
  • Traces in video portals: The potential of user generated data for the design of effective educational videos

    Perception and Action

    Duration 01/2020 - open

    In nearly all educational settings (schools, universities, further education), videos play an increasingly large role. On video portals learners can deepen and broaden their acquired knowledge and while watching they leave traces like pauses or skips. This cooperation project investigates how such usage data in conjunction with videos automatically prepared under pedagogical and psychological considerations can be harnessed to make video learning adaptive and effective.

    Go to project
  • Psychological determinants of risk perception about Artificial Intelligence

    Perception and Action

    Duration 10/2020 - open

    In societal discourse, Artificial Intelligence (AI) is strongly tied with both opportunities and risks. In this project, it is investigated how humans perceive the risks of AI and how their risk assessments are associated with psychological factors like prior knowledge and judgmental confidence. The behavioral consequences of risk perception are investigated, as well as intervention methods aimed at raising an awareness of AI risks.

    Go to project
  • Communicating politicized science

    Perception and Action

    Duration 05/2023 - open

    How should we communicate politiczed science such as climate change or COVID-19? We explore how metacognition, the insight that citizens have into the reliability and fallibility of their own knowledge, interacts with science communication to shape behavior and beliefs, and how metacognition is shaped back by science communication.

    Go to project
  • Modal and amodal event representations and the role of meta-cognition for dynamic event comprehension

    Perception and Action

    Duration 10/2023 - 09/2026

    Event perception and cognition theories assume dynamic events are segmented into meaningful chunks of sub-actions with partonomic relationships. This allows viewers to process streaming information in units and predict future states of action based on their expectations and event knowledge. Event models store relevant information for events and guide perception using schemas (or scripts). While event models hold immediately accessible representations stored in long-term memory, working event models process perceptual representations of unfolding activity throughout the event. The studies of this project will shed light on whether event processing in working event models and long-term event schemas are modality-dependent. Considering that the grain of action leads to different levels of processing – with fine-grained events being aggregated into coarse-grained events – understanding modal and amodal representations of fine and coarse context will be important to the perceptual and conceptual organization of event comprehension. Furthermore, this project will explore the role of confidence and metacognitive sensitivity in event cognition. Since sensory information is continuously processed at working event models to predict what will happen next, it is important to know if one’s cognition relies on the perception of event boundaries. Results obtained from metacognitive sensitivity measures will provide further evidence for the event models and their interactions with event schemata. Lastly, this project will address whether event schemata influence the processing of events in general and whether repeated exposure to new events changes their cognition. However, the testing of these questions will be applied using visual and verbal events to observe modality-specific effects of different context grains (fine and coarse).<br>

    Go to project
  • Leibniz-lab "Pandemic preparedness"

    Perception and Action

    Duration 04/2024 - 03/2027

    The Leibniz Lab is dedicated to enhancing pandemic preparedness by harnessing the interdisciplinary expertise of 41 Leibniz institutions. Its work spans four central domains: exploring how interactions among the environment, animals, and humans contribute to the emergence and spread of pathogens; mitigating the physical and psychological health impacts of pandemics; optimizing pandemic response strategies; and strengthening the resilience of educational systems in crisis contexts. By integrating diverse perspectives, the Lab functions as a dynamic think tank that complements clinical and infection-control efforts, and provides policymakers and civil society with evidence-based guidance. Recognizing the threat posed by emerging respiratory pathogens, the Lab investigates factors such as alternative livestock farming practices to curb zoonotic transmission, population-level immunity, and the biological mechanisms behind severe disease outcomes. These insights inform strategies to reinforce urban infrastructure and healthcare systems, as well as to enhance educational support for students and teachers during pandemic conditions. In addition, the Lab advances frameworks for robust international collaboration on pandemic preparedness and response. At the IWM, researchers contribute to this effort by examining science communication in pandemic contexts—particularly how individuals navigate and make sense of scientific information in environments saturated with conflicting, ambiguous, or misleading messages.

    Go to project
  • ArchiveGPT: Psychological and technical perspectives on the use of multimodal large language models in archives

    Perception and Action

    Duration 09/2024 - open

    Multimodal large language models (LLMs) generate texts based on image inputs. This makes them attractive for a wide range of applications where a large amount of image data needs to be processed. One of these applications is the cataloguing of archival images. ArchiveGPT thus focuses on applying a multimodal LLM to archaeological photo material provided by the Leibniz-Zentrum für Archäologie (LEIZA) in Mainz. We investigate the following questions: How does a multimodal LLM perform when confronted with – for the model, often unfamiliar – archaeological objects and terms? How do archive experts (compared to non-experts) perceive the quality of the model’s image descriptions? Can they at all tell the difference between these AI-generated descriptions and descriptions generated by archive experts? How good are they at estimating their ability to distinguish them beforehand? How important is trust in AI in regard to its use? For the first study on these questions, we generated the experimental material in close collaboration with the LEIZA. Provided with photocards from the image archive, a meta-data template usable in an archival cataloging process was generated for each photocard by the multimodal LLM and LEIZA archivists.

    Go to project
  • Leibniz-lab "Systemic sustainability" Sustainability – Oriented transfer products for societal actors

    Perception and Action

    Duration 04/2024 - 03/2027

    How can we protect biodiversity and the climate while ensuring a stable and resilient food supply? This central question lies at the heart of a research project that seeks innovative answers to this complex challenge. It aims to develop solutions that respect and sustainably use the planet’s limited resources. By bringing together experts from diverse disciplines, the project strives to identify and address knowledge gaps at the intersections of biodiversity, climate, agriculture, and nutrition. Its interdisciplinary approach fosters a holistic understanding of the complex interconnections among these areas. A key focus of the project is linking scientific research with public discourse. It prioritizes the integration of knowledge and the development of transformative solutions that can be applied at local, regional, and international levels. The overarching goal is to support societal shifts toward comprehensive sustainability through the promotion of innovation and evidence-based decision-making. Another essential component is the development of effective strategies for communicating scientific information to the public. This includes actively addressing misinformation related to sustainability. The project reviews and synthesizes various science communication methods, creates educational materials tailored to different audiences, and designs training programs that treat biodiversity, climate, agriculture, and nutrition as interconnected fields. It also explores new ways of transferring knowledge and technology, aiming to make complex information more accessible and engaging. These tools are intended to support both classroom teaching and self-directed learning. To test and refine its approaches, the project will implement activities at five pilot sites located in both developed and developing countries. These sites will help ensure the applicability and effectiveness of its solutions in real-world contexts.

    Go to project
  • A longitudinal study on the perceptions and dynamics of human-AI interaction

    Perception and Action

    Duration 08/2024 - 04/2026

    Our interdisciplinary longitudinal study investigates the evolving dynamics of human-AI interaction over six waves spanning one year. By examining individual, behavioral, and task-related variables, the project aims to uncover how users' trust in, perceptions of, self-efficacy, and willingness to engage with AI systems develop and interrelate over time. The insights gained from this research are essential for better understanding human-machine interaction, a critical foundation for fostering effective collaboration between users and AI systems. This knowledge will inform user-centered AI design and guide the ethical integration of these technologies into various aspects of everyday life.

    Go to project

Publications

Articles (peer-reviewed)

  • Fischer, H., Bojarskich, V., Ziemer, C.-T., Louis, W., Huff, M., & Rothmund, T. (in press). Zone-flooding, public confusion, and signal detection theory: A theoretical framework and registered report. Political Psychology.
  • Herrmann, A., Krippl, N., Fischer, H., Nieder, J., Griesel, S., Bärninghausen, T., Schildmann, J., Mikolajczyk, R., Danquah, I., Mezger, N., & Kantelhardt, E. (2025). Acceptability of health-only vs. health-and-climate framings in lifestyle-related climate-sensitive health counselling: Results of a randomised survey experiment in Germany. Lancet Planetary Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(25)00110-X

    Open Access


  • Potinteu, A.-E., Said, N., Jahn, G., & Huff, M. (2025). An insight into humans helping robots: The role of attitudes, anthropomorphic cues, and context of use. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 4, Article 100159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100159

    Open AccessPreregistration 1 | 2 DataCode


  • Said, N., Schumacher, L., & Huff, M. (2025). Artificial intelligence in medicine: The influence of medical expertise and perceived causability on medical AI risk and benefit perception. Journal of Risk Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2025.2493859

    Open AccessPreregistrationDataCode


  • Huff, M., Jacobsen, C., & Papenmeier, F. (2025). Edit blindness is not related to immersion and presence in Hollywood movies. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 19(2), 353-361. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000542

    Open AccessDataCode


  • Huff, M.*, Gagarina, N., Varkentin, E., & Brich, I. R.* (2025). Education, not age, linked to narrative comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 97, 102102. *shared first authorship. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102102

    Open AccessPreregistrationDataStudy materialCode


  • Kang, S., Potinteu, A.-E., & Said, N. (2025). ExplainitAI: When do we trust artificial intelligence? The influence of content and explainability in a cross-cultural comparison. https://doi.org/10.1145/3706599.3720222

    View articleData


  • Cologna, V., Meiler, S., Kropf, C. M., Lüthi, S., Mede, N. G., Bresch, D. N., Lecuona, O., Berger, S., Besley, J., Brick, C., Joubert, M., Maibach, E. W., Mihelj, S., Oreskes, N., Schäfer, M. S., Linden, S. v., Aziz, N. I., Abdulsalam, S., Shamsi, N. A., ... Zenklusen, A. (2025). Extreme weather event attribution predicts climate policy support across the world. Nature Climate Change. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-025-02372-4

    Open Access


  • Buder, J., Lindner, M. A., Oestermeier, U., Huff, M., Gerjets, P., Utz, S., & Cress, U. (2025). Generative Künstliche Intelligenz: Mögliche Auswirkungen auf die psychologische Forschung. Psychologische Rundschau(3), 171-183. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000699

    Open Access


  • Varkentin, E., Brich, I. R., Sünkel, U., von Thaler, A. K., Eschweiler, G. W., & Huff, M. (2025). Inference generation in older adults: Comparing pictorial and textual comprehension in the context of cognitive decline. Memory & Cognition. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-025-01736-7

    Open Access


  • Fischer, H., Kause, A., & Huff, M. (2025). Intellectual humility links to metacognitive ability. Personality and Individual Differences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2024.113028

    Open Access


  • Mede, N. G., Cologna, V., Berger, S., Besley, J., Brick, C., Joubert, M., Maibach, E. W., Mihelj, S., Oreskes, N., Schäfer, M. S., van der Linden, S., Abdul Aziz, N. I., Abdulsalam, S., Shamsi, N. A., Aczel, B., Adinugroho, I., Alabrese, E., Aldoh, A., Alfano, M., ... Zwaan, R. A. (2025). Perceptions of science, science communication, and climate change attitudes in 68 countries – the TISP dataset. Scientific Data, 12(1), 114. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-04100-7

    Open Access


  • Becker, F., Spannagl, C. I., Buder, J., & Huff, M. (2025). Performance rather than reputation affects humans’ trust towards an artificial agent. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 3, 100122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100122

    Open Access


  • Antes, N., Schwan, S., & Huff, M. (2025). Processing of veracity cues: How processing difficulty affects the memory of event description and judgment of confidence. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications(10), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-025-00629-2

    Open Access


  • Candan Şimşek, A., Aydın, T., Demirgüneş, E. A., & Şafak, P. A. (2025). Space in movies: Continuity and perceptual load guide spatial judgements. Art & Perception. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134913-BJA10068

    Open AccessDataStudy materialCode


  • Cologna, V., Mede, N. G., Berger, S., Besley, J., Brick, C., Joubert, M., Maibach, E. W., Mihelj, S., Oreskes, N., Schäfer, M. S., van der Linden, S., Abdul Aziz, N. I., Abdulsalam, S., Shamsi, N. A., Aczel, B., Adinugroho, I., Alabrese, E., Aldoh, A., Alfano, M., ... Zwaan, R. A. (2025). Trust in scientists and their role in society across 68 countries. Nature Human Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02090-5

    Open Access


  • Xu, W., Huff, M., & Papenmeier, F. (2024). A closer look at the agent advantage effect: An eye-tracking study on event role processing in pictures. Visual Cognition. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2024.2428468

    Open AccessDataCode


  • Anders, G., Buder, J., Merkt, M., Egger, E., & Huff, M. (2024). Associations between mind wandering, viewer interactions, and the meaningful structure of educational videos. Computers & Education, 212, Article 104996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.104996

    Open Access


  • Buder, J., Becker, F., Bareiß, J., & Huff, M. (2024). Beyond mere algorithm aversion: Are judgments about computer agents more variable? Communication Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502241303588

    Open Access


  • Brich, I. R., Papenmeier, F., Huff, M., & Merkt, M. (2024). Construction or updating? Event model processes during visual narrative comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 31(5), 2092–2101. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-023-02424-w

    Open Access


  • Sondermann, C., Huff, M., & Merkt, M. (2024). Distracted by a talking head? An eye tracking study on the effects of instructor presence in learning videos with animated graphic slides. Learning and Instruction, 91, Article 101878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101878

    Open AccessPreregistrationData


  • Parra, D., Antes, N., & Radvansky, G. A. (2024). Event cognition and holistic versus fragmented remembering and forgetting. In L. K. Samuelson, S. L. Frank, M. Toneva, A. Mackey, & E. Hazeltine (Eds.). Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (Vol. 46, pp. 4799-4804). https://escholarship.org/uc/item/11z0j11v

    Open Access


  • Candan Şimşek, A., Aydın, T., & Huff, M. (2024). How does it end? Endpoints of boundaries lead to completion in macro-events. Memory & Cognition. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-024-01657-x

    Open AccessPreregistrationDataStudy materialCode


  • Kaup, B., Ulrich, R., Bausenhart, K. M., Bryce, D., Butz, M. V., Dignath, D., Dudschig, C., Franz, V. H., Friedrich, C. K., Gawrilow, C., Heller, J., Huff, M., Hütter, M., Janczyk, M., Leuthold, H., Mallot, H. A., Nürk, H.-C., Ramscar, M., Said, N., ... Wong, H. Y. (2024). Modal and amodal cognition: an overarching principle in various domains of psychology. Psychological Research, 88, 307-337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-023-01878-w

    Open Access


  • Kläffling, L., Sittel, J., & Huff, M. (2024). Modality influences perceived film suspense but not time perception. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000684

    Open AccessPreregistrationDataCode


  • Candan Şimşek, A., Aydın, T., & Ozkan, Z. G. (2024). One perspective or two? Viewpoint dependency in visual events. Current Psychology, 43, 8624–8635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04997-0

    Open AccessDataStudy material


  • Candan Şimşek, A., & Kurum, E. (2024). Remembering cinematic sequences: Boundaries disrupt memory in fast paced visual events. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000661

    Open AccessStudy material


  • Timm, J. D., Huff, M., Schwan, S., & Papenmeier, F. (2024). Short-term transfer effects of Tetris on mental rotation: Review and registered report - A Bayesian approach. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 86(3), 1056-1064. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-024-02855-0

    Open AccessPreregistrationData


  • Papenmeier, F., Meyerhoff, H. S., Hecht, H., & Huff, M. (2024). Stereo viewing upsets cinematic continuity: Filmic cuts are more salient in 3D than in 2D movies. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 18(4), 607-616. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000476

    Open AccessData


  • Stark, P., Bozkir, E., Sójka, W., Huff, M., Kasneci, E., & Göllner, R. (2024). The impact of presentation modes on mental rotation processing: A comparative analysis of eye movements and performance. Scientific Reports(14), Article 12329. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-60370-6

    Open Access


  • Geers, M., Fischer, H., Lewandowsky, S., & Herzog, S. M. (2024). The political (a)symmetry of metacognitive insight into detecting misinformation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 153(8), 1961-1972. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001600

    Open Access


  • Buder, J., & Said, N. (2024). To whom do people reply in comment sections? Effects of attitude (un)congeniality, age, confidence, and knowledge. New Media & Society. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448241247214

    Open AccessPreregistration 1 | 2 DataStudy materialCode


  • Fischer, H., & Fleming, S. (2024). Why metacognition matters in politically contested domains. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 28(9), 783-785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2024.06.005

    Open Access


  • Said, N., Potinteu, A.-E., Brich, I. R., Buder, J., Schumm, H., & Huff, M. (2023). An artificial intelligence perspective: How knowledge and confidence shape risk and benefit perception. Computers in Human Behavior, 149, Article 107855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107855

    View article


  • Utz, S., Huff, M., & Said, N. (2023). Are you worried about getting COVID-19 or about losing your job? How different COVID-19 related fears are indirectly related to vaccination acceptance via media consumption. European Journal of Health Communication, 4(3), 72-92. https://doi.org/10.47368/ejhc.2023.305

    Open Access


  • Said, N.*, Frauhammer, L. T.*, & Huff, M. (2023). Consensus messaging in climate change communication: Metacognition as moderator variable in the gateway belief model. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 91, Article 102128. *shared first authorship. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102128

    View article


  • van den Broek, K. L., Luomba, J., van den Broek, J., & Fischer, H. (2023). Content and complexity of stakeholders’ mental models of socio-ecological systems. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 85, Article 101906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101906

    Open Access


  • Meyerhoff, H. S., Jaggy, O., Papenmeier, F., & Huff, M. (2023). Long-term memory representations for audio-visual scenes. Memory & Cognition, 51(2), 349-370. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-022-01355-6

    Open Access


  • Huff, M., & Bongartz, E. C. (2023). Low research-data availability in educational-psychology journals: no indication of effective research-data policies. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 6(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459231156419

    Open Access


  • Fischer, H., Huff, M., Anders, G., & Said, N. (2023). Metacognition, public health compliance, and vaccination willingness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(43), Article e2105425120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2105425120

    Open Access


  • Buder, J., Zimmermann, A., Buttliere, B., Rabl, L., Vogel, M., & Huff, M. (2023). Online interaction turns the congeniality bias into an uncongeniality bias. Psychological Science, 34(10), 1055-1068. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976231194590

    Open Access


  • Holford, D., Fasce, A., Tapper, K., Demko, M., Lewandowsky, S., Hahn, U., Abels, C. M., Al-Rawi, A., Alladin, S., Boender, T. S., Bruns, H., Fischer, H., Gilde, C., Hanel, P. H. P., Herzog, S. M., Kause, A., Lehmann, S., Nurse, M. S., Orr, C., ... Wulf, M. (2023). Science communication as a collective intelligence endeavor: A manifesto and examples for implementation. Science Communication, 45(4), 539-554. https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470231162634

    Open Access


  • Fischer, H., Wijermans, N., & Schlüter, M. (2023). Testing the social function of metacognition for common‐pool resource use. Cognitive Science, 47(3), Article e13212. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13212

    View article


  • Schwesig, R.*, Brich, I. R., Buder, J., Huff, M., & Said, N.* (2023). Using Artificial Intelligence (AI)? Risk and opportunity perception of AI predict people’s willingness to use AI. Journal of Risk Research, 26(10), 1053-1084. *shared first authorship. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2023.2249927

    View article


  • Candan Şimşek, A., Karaca, N., Kirmizi, B. C., & Ekiz, F. (2023). What makes a visual scene more memorable? A rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) study with dynamic visual scenes. Visual Cognition, 31(6), 452-471. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2023.2288361

    Open AccessDataStudy materialCode


  • Jungmann, S. M., Becker, F., & Witthöft, M. (2022). Erfassung der Lebendigkeit mentaler Vorstellungsbilder: Adaptation und Validierung deutschsprachiger Versionen des Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire (VVIQ) und des Plymouth Sensory Imagery Questionnaire (PSI-Q). Diagnostica, 68(3), 125-136. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a000291

    Open Access


  • Fischer, H., Huff, M., & Said, N. (2022). Polarized climate change beliefs: No evidence for science literacy driving motivated reasoning in a U.S. national study. American Psychologist, 77(7), 822-835. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000982

    View article


  • Said, N.*, Frauhammer, L. T.*, & Huff, M. (2022). Pre-registered replication of the gateway belief model – Results from a representative German sample. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 84, Article 101910. *shared first authorship. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101910

    View article


  • Merkt, M., Hoppe, A., Bruns, G., Ewerth, R., & Huff, M. (2022). Pushing the button: Why do learners pause online videos? Computers & Education, 176, Article 104355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104355

    Open Access


  • Said, N.*, Fischer, H.*, & Anders, G. (2021). Contested science: Individuals with higher metacognitive insight into interpretation of evidence are less likely to polarize. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29(2), 668-680. *shared first authorship. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-021-01993-y

    View article


  • Buder, J., Rabl, L., Feiks, M., Badermann, M., & Zurstiege, G. (2021). Does negatively toned language use on social media lead to attitude polarization? Computers in Human Behavior, 116, Article 106663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106663

    View article


  • Brich, I. R., Bause, I. M., Hesse, F. W., & Wesslein, A.-K. (2021). How spatial information structuring in an interactive technological environment affects decision performance under working memory load. Computers in Human Behavior, 123, Article 106860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106860

    View article


  • Fischer, H., & Said, N. (2021). Importance of domain-specific metacognition for explaining beliefs about politicized science: the case of climate change. Cognition, 208, Article 104545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104545

    View article


  • Huff, M., Rosenfelder, D., Oberbeck, M., Merkt, M., Papenmeier, F., & Meitz, T. G. K. (2020). Cross-codal integration of bridging-event information in narrative understanding. Memory & Cognition, 48(6), 942-956. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-020-01039-z

    Open Access


  • Widany, S., Reichart, E., Ambos, I., & Huff, M. (2020). Datennutzung der VHS- und Verbundstatistik. Potenziale für Bildungsforschung, -politik und -praxis. Zeitschrift für Weiterbildungsforschung, 43(1), 75-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40955-019-0136-x

    View article


  • Merkt, M., & Huff, M. (2020). Does the position of source information for multiple documents matter? Insights from two experiments. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 62, Article 101900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101900

    View article


  • Bause, I. M., Brich, I. R., Hesse, F. W., & Wesslein, A.-K. (2020). Does touching information on a surface tablet affect how it is evaluated. Journal of Articles in Support of the Null-Hypothesis, 16(2), 127-146. https://www.jasnh.com/pdf/Vol16-No2-article5.pdf

    View article


  • Elson, M., Huff, M., & Utz, S. (2020). Metascience on Peer Review: Testing the Effects of a Study’s Originality and Statistical Significance in a Field Experiment. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(1), 53-65. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919895419

    View article


  • Blömacher, K., Nöcker, G., & Huff, M. (2020). The evolution of mental models in relation to initial information while driving automated. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 68, 198-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.11.003

    View article


  • Fischer, H., van den Broek, K. L., Ramisch, K., & Okan, Y. (2020). When IPCC graphs can foster or bias understanding: evidence among decision-makers from governmental and non-governmental institutions. Environmental Research Letters, 15(11), Article 114041. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abbc3c

    Open Access


  • Buder, J. (2020). Wieviel Mensch steckt in der Maschine? Information - Wissenschaft & Praxis, 71(1), 17-22. https://doi.org/10.1515/iwp-2019-2061

    Open Access


  • Amelung, D.*, Fischer, H.*, Herrmann, A., Aall, C., Louis, V. R., Becher, H., Wilkinson, P., & Sauerborn, R. (2019). Human health as a motivator for climate change mitigation: results from four European high-income countries. Global Environmental Change, 57, Article 101918. *shared first authorship. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.05.002

    View article


  • Fischer, H., Amelung, D., & Said, N. (2019). The accuracy of German citizens’ confidence in their climate change knowledge. Nature Climate Change, 9(10), 776-780. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0563-0

    View article


  • Watts, N., Amann, M., Arnell, N., Ayeb-Karlsson, S., Belesova, K., Berry, H., Bouley, T., Boykoff, M., Byass, P., Cai, W., Campbell-Lendrum, D., Chambers, J., Daly, M., Dasandi, N., Davies, M., Depoux, A., Dominguez-Salas, P., Drummond, P., Ebi, K. L., ... Costello, A. (2018). The 2018 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: shaping the health of nations for centuries to come. The Lancet, 392(10163), 2479-2514. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32594-7

    View article

Books and book chapters

  • Merkt, M., & Huff, M. (2025). Dynamic visualizations: How to overcome challenges and seize opportunities. In A. Gegenfurtner & I. Kollar (Eds.). Designing effective digital learning environments (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003386131-8

    Open Access


  • Fischer, H., & van den Broek, K. L. (2021). Climate change knowledge, meta-knowledge and beliefs. In A. Franzen & S. Mader (Eds.). Research Handbook on Environmental Sociology (pp. 116-132). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800370456.00015

    View book chapter


  • Buder, J., Bodemer, D., & Ogata, H. (2021). Group awareness. In U. Cress, C. Rosé, A. Wise, & J. Oshima (Eds.). International handbook of computer-supported collaborative learning (pp. 295-313). Springer International Publishing.
  • Merkt, M., & Huff, M. (2018). Digitale Medien in der frühen Bildung (Kindertagesstätten und Kindergärten). In J. Stromer (Ed.). Psychologie-Wissen für Fachkräfte in Kita, Krippe und Hort (pp. 333-339). Hogrefe.

Research data

Software

  • Anders, G. (2023). mGPT - Asychronous mass request handler for large language models. Tübingen: Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien.
  • Anders, G. (2023). whisperTranscriber - Whisper-based Transcription with Word-level Timestamping for Video and Audio data. Tübingen: Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien.
  • Anders, G. (2023). SponScraper - A large scale data scraper for comments and articles from Spiegel Online. Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien, Tübingen.
  • Wijermans, N., & Fischer, H. (2022). “AgentEx-Meta” (Version 1.0.0). CoMSES Computational Model Library.

    View software


  • Oestermeier, U., Kupke, S., & Huff, M. (2020). TrackTheTracker - Ein Browser-Plugin zur Visualisierung der Echtzeit-Datenströme beim Browsen.

Other publications